Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
P. Buldorini
To Win
D. Marques
To Win
Peter Buldorini vs Diogo Marques Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Buldorini vs Marques analysis and find out who is favored!
Upcoming Match
Buldorini VS Marques PREDICTION Hard
M25 Vale do Lobo atp
- / Q2 round
ODDS
Match Overview - When Will They Play?
Peter Buldorini takes on Diogo Marques in the ATP M25 Vale do Lobo Men's Singles 2023 on . Our Expert betting tips are based on over 200,000 past match simulations. When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page.
Peter Buldorini vs Diogo Marques Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Buldorini has won 47.05% of points on his second serve, while Marques has won 44.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Buldorini, in recent form, has won 46.58% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marques has won 53.98%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.54% and 33.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Buldorini has saved 58.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marques has saved 47.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Buldorini has won 48% of matches played (W/L 24/ 26), with Marques winning 61.9% (W/L 26/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Buldorini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 16/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Marques has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Buldorini has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.22% of matches (W/L 21/ 20), where as Marques has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 26/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Buldorini has played against opponents with an average rank of 188.96 while Marques has played against players with an average rank of 66.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Buldorini has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marques has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player formance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below. Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Buldorini has converted 49.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marques has converted 45.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Buldorini 0 - 0 Marques
832
Rank
832
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
48% (30-32)
Career Total W/L
55% (41-34)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
62% (16-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Peter Buldorini | Diogo Marques |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (6/3) | 64% (16/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (9/9) | 63% (35/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (80/76) | 56% (294/233) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 15 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.02 |
| DFs Total | 25 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:13 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 151.89 | 16.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (288/503) | 64% (237/372) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (194/288) | 62% (147/237) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (107/215) | 47% (64/135) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (22/42) | 44% (23/52) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (194/475) | 43% (189/438) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (4/7) | 64% (16/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 20% (10/2) |
Peter Buldorini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Peter Buldorini
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Peter Buldorini
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Buldorini
Player
Keisuke Saitoh
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
1-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Buldorini
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Peter Buldorini
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Buldorini
Player
Daisuke Sumizawa
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Buldorini
Player
Jacques-Kai Inoue
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristijan Juhas
Player
Peter Buldorini
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
58
|
2-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Peter Buldorini
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Castagnola
Player
Peter Buldorini
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Diogo Marques Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Diogo Marques
59%
(
62 of
105)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Diogo Marques
Player
Alexey Aleshchev
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
view more
Buldorini Vs Marques Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
